ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST SCRUM
Arguments for and against the adoption of scrum
supporting scrum
by Steve Berczuk- November 12, 2019
"scrum is a fairly minimal agile process framework that you can adapt to work best for your team but sometimes adopting scrum take the idea of adaption too literally and "adapt" the process so that is is simply a veneer on top of their existing.
if you truly believe that you understand scrum values, fell free to adapt out of the box but do this with caution, since scrum is a very different way of working that most organizations are used to, most teams need to practice to understand the value of principles first, having a good baseline to adapt is for the best."
by Chandana
"scrums can help team complete projects quickly and effectively
scrums ensures effective use of time and money
development are tested and coded during sprints."
by Claire Drumond
"scrum could take time to be fully understood, especially if the development team is acclimatized to a typical waterfall model. this concept of smaller iterations, daily scrums meetings, sprint reviews and identifying a scrum master could be a very challenging cultural shift for a new team.
but, the long-term benefits for out weight the initial learning curve, scrum's success in developing complex hardware and software products across diverse industries and vertical makes it a compelling framework to adopt for your organization"
against the adoption of scrum
when your organization is already delighting , your customers and users of your product are happy, you also get the results you wants to get so as your team know how to react to changing market condition.
you do not need scrum
*requires transformation at organization level
a company needs to have changes at an organizational level if they want to get success from the scrum. thus, it means the business owner and the developers have to collaborates in the sprints. hence an organization needs to get rid of their own barriers which can be difficult to eliminates.